Research on minimally invasive hip replacement surgery is mixed and it is not clear whether it has an advantage over traditional hip replacement surgery.
Minimally invasive hip replacement surgery.
The benefits of minimally invasive hip replacement have been reported to include less damage to soft tissues leading to a quicker less painful recovery and more rapid.
A minimally invasive total hip replacement uses a smaller cut incision than a traditional total hip replacement.
American association of hip and knee surgeons minimally invasive and small incision joint replacement surgery.
Minimally invasive techniques are designed to reduce the tissue trauma associated with hip replacement.
The hope is that minimally invasive techniques will allow for an easier recovery in the short term and provide equal or better results in the long term.
1 6 this area of ongoing research is an example of how the medical field is continually evolving and trying to improve outcomes for patients.
The surgery is performed with smaller incisions.
The surgeon then removes the arthritic hip joint and replaces this with a metal and plastic implant.
What surgeons should consider park ridge ill 2004.
Less trauma to the tissues results in less postoperative discomfort and.
Traditional hip replacement surgery is done through an incision that is usually about 5 to 8 inches in length.
In the hip joint the rounded head of the thigh bone the femoral head moves smoothly inside the round socket of the hip bone.
Minimally invasive and small incision total hip replacement surgery is an evolving area and more research is needed on the long term function and durability of the implants.
Beneath the incision the muscle is separated and the hip joint is exposed.
In the meantime people considering hip replacement surgery and their surgeons must make decisions.